Repent, and believe in the Gospel (Mk 1:15) - Part 6. Vatican Council II and heresiesPost date: 2017-03-09
Repent, and believe in the Gospel (Mk 1:15)
Part 6: Vatican Council II and heresies
In what times did the Council begin and what issues needed to be addressed? Under the influence of German Protestant theology, the heresies of Modernism condemned by Pope St Pius X (1907) were revived. The promotion of decadent influences increased in the world, which took on a mass character through the expansion of television and began to manipulate every family. The decadent influences programmed family crises and thus unleashed an avalanche of divorces. Popularization of rock music entailed an invasion of the cult of violence, impurity and occultism.
The demand of the times was to give clear doctrinal and moral directives against the heresies of Neo-Modernism and against demoralization. Instead of the renewal of Christianity came the opposite. The programme of John XXIII through so-called aggiornamento started the process of opening to the world. Its culmination today is the heretical exhortation Amoris Laetitia which destroys objective moral standards.
How is it possible that the II Vatican Council declared a heresy of syncretism with paganism as well as a heresy holding that our God is identical with the pagan moon god of Mecca?
In a 1963 session when 2,135 bishops on average participated in the meetings, only a little over 200 (10%) took the floor in the debate. The other 90% never spoke and limited themselves to listening and voting. It is like in the case of many episcopal conferences, where reigns a kind of collective spirit which puts pressure on the majority of bishops to accept the attitudes of the active minority pursuing specific goals.
Truth cannot be created through ballots. Truth can only be found. Therefore, neither the episcopal conference nor the council can vote on what is and what is not truth. Neither can they decide by ballot what is and what is not heresy. Ballots cannot stop heresy from being a heresy, just as they cannot change a lie into the truth.
The Council represented a system of manipulation on the part of the active minority of theologians with a liberal spirit rather than the Spirit of Christ! They pursued a specific goal, namely to smuggle their heretical spirit in the Church and to expel the Holy Spirit! One of the councillors at the Council was e.g. the theologian Hans Küng, who proved himself to be a heretic after the Council. Card. Franz König also belonged to this group. He popularized a pagan idol – the Dalai Lama – in the Christian world. In addition, König pushed through the heretical declaration Nostra Aetate as the final document of the Council.
One thing is that the Fathers of the Council were manipulated, but the other thing is that this Council and every document separately was approved by Pope Paul VI. How to explain in this situation the assistance of the Holy Spirit and papal infallibility, if the reality is that heresies were approved and have borne disastrous fruits?
Explanation: In his Dogmatic Bull “Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio”, Pope Paul IV clearly indicates that if a bishop or even a pope has committed heresy, he is an invalid pope. Hence it follows that Paul VI who approved the heretical statements as well as John XXIII who opened the Council and gave liberal theologians the lead were heretics or accomplices in heresy. It follows from this that the Council was invalid!
Let us draw attention to concrete examples of manipulation on the part of these heretical activists and their heretical spirit.
A quote from Nostra Aetate (NA):
“3. The Church has also a high regard for the Muslims. They worship God, who is one, living and subsistent, merciful and almighty, the Creator of heaven and earth, (Cf. St Gregory VII, Letter XXI to Anzir /Nacir/, King of Mauritania /Pl. 148, col. 450f./) who has also spoken to humanity.”
Explanation: To have “a high regard for the Muslims” is a manipulating statement. What we need is a true view of the Muslims. It means to be conscious of the essence of their religious system and to have a true critical view of it. For example, the Koran says: “Those are infidels who say: God is the Messiah, son of Mary.” (5:72) In the Muslim view, Christians are infidels and Jesus is no God!
Moreover, we are obliged to have a critical view of the sayings of the Koran, which form the ideological basis of terrorism and have become the cause of 270 million so-called Kafirs being massacred! Islam carried out an invasion of the civilized world in 548 battles. To have a true view means not to conceal the fact that one million Europeans were abducted into slavery in these battles, and moreover, to have a true view of the reality that wherever jihad was waged, the original culture was uprooted. The territory of Turkey, including Galatia, Cappadocia and the cities of Ephesus, Tarsus, Iconium, Lystra, Antioch, was the cradle of Christianity thanks to the mission of the Apostle Paul (see Epistles to the Ephesians, Galatians). In 1453, Constantinople was conquered, and Christians now make up 0.1% of the population on the territory of Turkey.
The Koran prescribes in 2:216: “You are commanded to fight although you dislike it. You may hate something that is good for you…” According to Sharia law, if a Muslim becomes a Christian, he is subject to the death penalty and if anyone kills him, he will not be punished. Did the authors of NA not know that? They did, but they pursued their aim – to promote a heretical spirit and to prepare the Islamization of Europe.
Muhammad chose the highest (akbar) among 360 pagan gods in Mecca – Allah, the crescent moon god, and by way of terror he forced this pseudo-god not only on the whole Arab world but also on the Christian territories. Bloody Allah is not identical with God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Quote: “God, merciful…”
Explanation: This is a mockery of the whole testimony of history and a travesty of the truth. Pope Benedict XVI quoted the Byzantine emperor Manuel, who said: “Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”
Moreover, it is a mockery to talk about mercy when the Koran says: “And kill them wherever you overtake them... Such is the retribution of the disbelievers.” (2:191) Today we can see this “mercy” in practice – bombings in Paris or Brussels, 1915 genocide of 1.5 million Armenians… It is a gross lie to say 50 years after the genocide that the bloody god of Islam is merciful! The fruits of this “merciful” god are 270 million Kafirs killed and a million Christians taken into slavery. “It is not permissible to give zakat (alms) to a Kafir (non-Muslim).” (h.8.24[*]) “They (Kafirs) will be cursed, and wherever they are found, they will be seized and murdered. It was Allah’s same practice with those who came before them, and you will find no change in Allah’s ways.” (Koran 33:60)
So much for the false statement about Allah being a merciful god.
It is also a lie and heresy to refer to the god Allah as almighty and the Creator!
Another manoeuvre of the NA authors is manipulation of the Letter of Pope St Gregory VII: “Cf. St Gregory VII, Letter XXI to Anzir /Nacir/, King of Mauritania /Pl. 148, col. 450f./”
Explanation: The Muslim ruler sent several missionaries to the Pope to ask him to consecrate a bishop for Mauritania. Naturally, the missionaries informed the Pope who that ruler was and said that he had already accepted the God of Christians in his heart. Therefore, Gregory VII makes it clear to the ruler in a private diplomatic rather than a dogmatic letter that he knows about his inner attitude. In the letter, he writes “we (meaning you and me) have the same God”. However, it is a fallacy to say that Islam professes the Christian God as it is said by the NA authors who appeal to the letter with the aim of manipulating the opinion.
In addition, in his letter to Spanish princes (1073), this same Pope encouraged them to struggle to regain the territory occupied by the Saracens, and in the text he repeatedly referred to Muslims as pagans and said that they did not know God. This is a true attitude of St Gregory VII towards Muslims.
Concerning a so-called regard for other religions, the NA authors write:
Quote: “Thus, in Hinduism people explore the divine mystery… (and have) recourse to God in confidence and love.”
Response: Hinduism does not worship one God, the Creator, but many gods (polytheism). The cow is worshipped as a goddess, and so are even mice, snakes and rats! What does the Scripture say? “What communion has light with darkness? And what accord has Christ with Belial?” (2Cor 6:14-15)
Quote: “Buddhism proposes a way of life by which people can, with confidence and trust, attain a state of perfect liberation and reach supreme illumination either through their own efforts or with divine help.”
Response: All men are in bondage to original sin and can achieve forgiveness of sins, perfect liberation and supreme illumination only in Jesus Christ, and that through conversion, repentance and the following of Christ.
Reincarnation denies the personal and true God, the immortal human soul, sin, God’s judgment, Christ’s redemptive death for our sins, heaven and hell! Koan is no illumination but the loss of conscience and reason. Nirvana and enlightenment is, in fact, demonic possession.
Quote: “So, too, other religions … (outline) a programme of life covering doctrine, moral precepts and sacred rites.”
Response: Martyrs preferred to sacrifice their lives rather than drop a grain of incense as a sign of worship of demons in pagan rites! Pagan religions in their rites sacrifice to demons and not to God (1Cor 10:20). Their doctrine prevents man from recognizing and accepting not only the objective truth but also the revealed truth, Jesus Christ as the Saviour.
Quote: “The Church, therefore, urges its sons and daughters to enter with prudence and charity into discussion and collaboration with members of other religions. Let Christians … acknowledge, preserve and encourage the spiritual and moral truths found among non-Christians.”
Response: In other words, let them preserve paganism. This is a mockery of the apostles and all missionaries who laid down their lives for Christ. The absolute antithesis of this heretical statement is the words of Christ to the Apostle Paul: “I am sending you to open their eyes (i.e. of the Gentiles), in order to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins by faith in Me.” (Acts 26:17-18) So no discussion and no collaboration, but we must know that they need to be delivered from the power of Satan and turned to God. The II Vatican Council, contrary to the Scripture, labels idolatry, magic, divination, violence, sexual perversion and other immoralities of pagans as “the spiritual and moral truths”.
To acknowledge, preserve and encourage the worship of pagan demons, and at the same time to confess the faith in the one God and the only Saviour Jesus Christ is spiritual schizophrenia!
The Nostra Aetate declaration ought to be entitled as follows: “How to betray Christ by replacing mission with dialogue and end up in hell”.
The statements used by the Nostra Aetate authors are heretical, intended to manipulate, and represent the spirit of lies and heresy!
The reality is that the Nostra Aetate declaration contains manifest heresies against the First Commandment (Deu 5:6-9) as well as against the whole Christian tradition. The reality is the pernicious fruits 50 years after the Council. Are church representatives willing to repent? What concrete steps of repentance need to be made?
1) It is necessary to proclaim Pope John XXIII a heretic for the reason that he programmed the spirit of the Council with the phrase “aggiornamento” – openness to the world. Consequently, he must be deprived of the title of “saint” and also posthumously excommunicated from the Catholic Church as a heretic! (anathema acc. Gal 1:8-9)
2) Vatican II is invalid by reason of manifest heresies, and therefore its resolutions are not binding for Christians. It is necessary to admit it publicly! To implement heretical teachings is spiritual suicide!
3) Similarly, Pope Paul VI, who abused his authority and approved the heresies of Vatican II, must be deprived of the title of “blessed” and posthumously excommunicated from the Catholic Church!
4) Pope John Paul II, who convened meetings in Assisi (1986, 2002) in the spirit of Vatican II heresies concerning a regard for pagan religions and their demons, annulled the excommunication of Freemasons (1983), gave tacit consent to clerical paedophilia and was silent on the spread of the Neo-Modernist heresy through the so-called historical-critical method, must be posthumously excommunicated from the Catholic Church, as was the case with Pope Honorius I, and deprived of the title of “saint”. To follow “saint” heretics is the road to hell.
Vatican II has moulded opinion over a period of 50 years. This opinion has had an impact on all theological schools, all religious communities, the Catholic press, Catholic literature and the whole Catholic community. It is therefore not enough just to make the above-mentioned steps of repentance but it is necessary to make steps contrary to the heretical trend that will lead to the recovery of the Body of Christ – the Church!
Vatican II de facto eliminated true apologia and true mission and opened the way for nearly all heresies! It is necessary to restore Catholic mission as well as true apologia of faith! It is necessary to return through true repentance to the sound roots of the faith founded on the Gospel, the apostles’ doctrine, tradition of saints and Church Fathers, and not on false prophets like heretical theologians.
The process of restoration of both the individual and the community must be founded on personal repentance, conversion and the following of Christ! “Draw near to God and He will draw near to you.” (Jam 4:8)
Bishops of the Catholic and the Orthodox Churches
[*] an index number in the Sharia law text, The Reliance of the Traveller