Conclusion: On 4th July 2004 we applied to the General Assembly OSBM and on 16th July 2004 to the Congregation for the Oriental Churches for a monastery sui iuris. By that time none of us had ever had any canonical reproof. After the application was made and after the events on 1st August 2004, we were marked as disobedient. This abstract phrase about disobedience was used against us without any juridical evidence of guilt in all canonical reproofs and exclusion decrees within half a year.

The image of obedience in the eyes of the OSBM authorities was like this: in the name of obedience to renounce our request for a transition from the OSBM Order into a monastery sui iuris subordinate to a bishop.

The response to our application for a monastery sui iuris was our procedural exclusion and moral blackening. The evidence is a quickened process of exclusion without observation of the Canonical law norms and without any opportunity for a defence.