- Publications UOGCC
- Frame-up trial against us
- Request for monastery sui iuris and consequences of this requiest
- Consequences of publishment of episcopal consecrations
- A crime in Stryi
- Liquidation of the contemplative monastery of St. Elijah
- Letters concerning Ukrainian laws
- Crisis in the Church
- HCT
- False regard for paganism
- Contemporary heresies in the Church
- The true and false spirituality
- Calls to repentance
- Appeals to the confession of faith
- Excommunications and anathemas
- Fruits of apostasy - paedophilic crimes
- Freemasonry
- Letters to bishops
- Obedience
- The spirit of Focolare
- Charismatic renewal
- Diagnosis of the state of the Church
- Crisis in the UGCC
- Husar's heresies
- The true and false spirituality
- HCT
- False regard for paganism
- Calls to repentance
- Appeals to confession of faith
- Letters to bishops
- Excommunications and anathemas
- View of RISU, UCU and info-department of UGCC
- From the history
- Proposals for renewal
- Election of new bishops
- Another
- Reform
- Pascendi Dominici gregis
- Reform of priestly formation
- Reform of religious institutes
- The renewal of the Church
- The Canon law
- Unity of Christians
- Lives of the Saints
- Essence of Christianity
- First Commandment - occultism
- Spiritual fight
- Interior prayer
- Keeping of Sunday
- Other models of internal prayer
- Sabbatical year
- Biblical lessons
- Reflection on the Word of God
- Word of life
- News

English > UOGCC Publications > Letter
Liturgy and liturgical space
Post date: 2018-11-02Autor: BCP
Liturgy and liturgical space
The Second Vatican Council set out a liturgical reform. Latin as the liturgical language was abolished and the mother tongue was introduced. The priest began to say the Mass facing the people with his back to the tabernacle. In many cases, the tabernacle was placed in the side chapel. The biblical model of the temple – the holy of holies, the sanctuary, and the place for the people – was thus distorted. In the Catholic temple, the tabernacle corresponded to the place of God’s dwelling – the holy of holies, and the altar in the chancel corresponded to the place of the offering of sacrifice by the priest. It was separated from the space for the people by a rail, and in the Eastern liturgy it is still separated by an iconostasis. This is to emphasize the sacredness of this space where God dwells and where the unbloody sacrifice is offered to God. Before the liturgical reform, the priest faced the tabernacle with his back to the people. In this position, he was better able to concentrate on experiencing the mystery of the Eucharist, and he also did not disturb others as he did not draw attention to himself.
It is currently recommended that each diocese should have an opportunity to make certain liturgical adjustments. May they lead to a deepening of faith and sacredness, and not vice versa!
Many priests propose that they should take the same position during the Mass as the priests over hundreds of centuries in the Church’s Tradition, and as is still practised in the Orthodox Church – i.e. both the priest and the people face the centre which is the tabernacle.
Some priests also suggest a moment of silence after the Consecration. It disposes one to become aware of the reality of Christ’s redemptive death on the cross, of His sacrifice even for me and my sins.
In the Eastern liturgy, this period of time of approximately 3-5 minutes is devoted to the Epiclesis during which the choir sings the antiphon: “We praise You, we bless You, we thank You, O Lord, and we pray to You, our God!” The antiphon creates an atmosphere for experiencing the mystery and at the same time for invoking the Holy Spirit to descend on the people of God and on the gifts presented.
In the Latin liturgy, in the moment of silence after the Consecration, the priest can silently pray the Canon instead of reciting it aloud, just as it was practised before the liturgical reform.
Fr. Wenceslas
1 November 2018





