Word of prophecy to the Christians of Europe

 

(Nature of the Lisbon Treaty)

 

On 2nd October 2009 the second referendum was held in Ireland. This referendum did not concern Ireland only, but the whole European Union – that means, all Europe which, however, has been Christian for 2000 years. Here the so-called Lisbon Treaty was brought forward. It has not been truly defined anywhere what the sense, purpose and background of the Lisbon Treaty is. This treaty is connected with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Who takes credit for the approval of the Lisbon Treaty by the referendum is above all Bishop Noel Treanor and ex-Card. Seán Batist Brady, Primate of All-Ireland and President of the Bishops’ Conference.

 

Bishop Noel Treanor worked for almost 20 years as a priest in the Commission of the Bishops’ Conferences of the European Community (COMECE). On 12th June 2008 the referendum in Ireland rejected the Lisbon Treaty and in that same month this priest with the spirit of the New Age was consecrated bishop and sent to Ireland with the purpose of trenchwork against God’s law and against the Christian values of Europe. A week before the second referendum this bishop gave an address and hypocritically in the name of the Church – in the name of God – manipulated the believers. He abused his episcopal authority against the essential values of the Gospel and against the Spirit of God. He declared hypocritically: “I state unequivocally that a Catholic can, without reserve and in good conscience, vote ‘Yes’ for the Lisbon Treaty. There are no grounds to justify a ‘No’ vote in the Lisbon Treaty on the basis of specifically religious or ethical concerns.”

 

The Bishop knows that the EU promotes homosexual marriages and introduces antichristian and antiethical laws (abortions, euthanasia...). These are grounds which point out unequivocally that a Catholic, according to conscience, must not vote for the Lisbon Treaty.

 

How could this man become a bishop? Who appoints people with the spirit of betrayal to the key positions in the Church? It is painful that ex-Card. Brady, who gave as if a pro-Catholic address before the first referendum, now became a turncoat. We have to warn of the fact that this Cardinal denied Christ. The same was done also by the other Cardinals of the Catholic Church, who remained in unity with the widespread heresies. For this reason, on 15th September 2009, all Cardinals fell under the latae sententiae penalty of excommunication and under God’s anathema.

 

The EU leadership rightly regards this treacherous Church structure as its best ally – in the liquidation of living and true Christianity. This structure includes Bishop N. Treanor too.

He states hypocritically: “Citizens of religious faith need to secure and use the opportunities provided to Churches and faith based organisations in Article 17 of the Lisbon Treaty to secure their rightful place in the dialogue about Europe and its values.”

What dialogue when antichristian values have already been established by law? Believers do not have a duty to carry on a dialogue about Europe but they have a duty, in season and out of season, to preach God’s word about salvation, for men will heap up for themselves teachers according to their own desires and be turned aside to fables (cf. 2Tim 4:2-3). His statement that “a rejection of the Lisbon Treaty might weaken the influence of our Christian values on the European Union” is a mockery.

 

Response: The opposite is true. An adoption of the Lisbon Treaty will necessarily weaken the influence of the Christian values.

 

The apostatical hierarchy is the most efficient factor in manipulating the believers into their self-murder which ends up in eternal damnation!

 

What does the Czech President V. Klaus say as to the Lisbon Treaty? Quotation: “It is not true that my complaint about the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is a single concrete sentence. My fears are far greater. They stem from the fact that all the indications are that in connection with the Lisbon Treaty the Charter will in future be interpreted and promoted by the European Court of Justice as well as by the Courts in individual member states in a manner which is dangerous for us. ... The courts throughout Europe will interpret such terms of European law as ‘discrimination’ or the newly established ‘European citizenship’ in a way that will touch the affairs of the past.” (i.e. creating an opportunity to take revenge upon all undesirable opponents) “However, only concrete judicial practice will give the true answer when after the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty, including the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, we will no longer be able to defend ourselves against its resolutions. Making decisions will no longer be under our control.” (An interview with the President for Lidové Noviny, 17th October 2009)

 

In its essence, the Lisbon Treaty (LT) undermines the family founded on natural marriage, the right to life from the moment of conception until natural death, the sacred character of Sunday, the right of Christian institutions, including schools, to preservation of their spiritual values. Decadent culture, which is systematically supported in the European Union, destroys ethical and Christian values even in the private and subjective sphere of man.

 

Benedict XVI put a question: “If the EU governments want to be closer to their citizens, how can they eliminate from the European identity the essential element, i.e. Christianity, which the vast majority of the continent identifies with?” The prevailing attitude within the EU leads to the denial of the rights of Christians to intervene in a public discussion concerning e.g. stem cell research, status of homosexual unions, priority status of the family founded on natural marriage, culture of life, euthanasia and abortions.

 

EU culture contradicts the Christian tradition and heritage of the large majority of the member states. The Lisbon Treaty strongly rejects the nature and spirit of the Christian message.

 

Compared with the past Communist superpower (the USSR), the EU is far more dangerous. The Moscow ideology dictated and the other republics in the USSR thus lost their sovereignty. The EU, however, works even towards internal disintegration of the individual and family, and thus towards spiritual suicide of the whole society. In this respect the EU is much worse. Regarding the Communists, they protected children against moral devastation through homosexuals. In the EU, however, moral and spiritual devastation is planned and purposeful. So it is a criminal system and ideology against humanity, far worse than Nazism which was condemned in Nuremberg as a criminal system!

 

Planned devastation of the individual is carried out as early as preschool and school age by means of homosexual pornography and forcible homosexuality, which leads to a spiritual decay connected with drugs, alcoholism and AIDS. This is in fact demonization of the individual and society. We remind: In Germany 60% of homosexuals are infected with AIDS and 75% in Canada.

 

In the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights discrimination in fact means that if homosexuals contaminate minors, these cannot defend themselves, for this would be regarded as discrimination of homosexuals. The EU’s response to the Lithuanian Law on the Protection of Minors is the evidence of this. Whatever opposition to evil will be termed discrimination, which will be followed by laws on so-called homophobia and this will in fact be christianophobia – persecution of Christians.

 

A radical change of thinking has taken place. Analogy: Man has always fought diseases in order to save the organism. Following the change of thinking settled in the LT, the organism commits discrimination against diseases unless it lets them develop freely! Therefore it is necessary to liquidate all remedies and under a strict prohibition not to allow them to be applied because it is discrimination against diseases.

 

Antichristian laws and spirit will never come into conflict with the so-called official but traitorous Church structure because it will always invent such theological formulation as to deceive the believers and to disguise the antichristian character of these laws with religious phrases.

 

The spirit of the apostatical hierarchy has been unmasked on the example of the Irish prelate Noel Treanor. The spirit of the EU has been unmasked through the encroachment on the Lithuanian legislation which adopted a law prohibiting direct dissemination to minors of public information whereby homosexual, bisexual or polygamous relations are promoted. This information has a detrimental effect on their mental and moral development.

 

We are astonished at the situation in Europe – that there is at all a need for such law, and what is even more incomprehensible is that the European Union offers opposition to it! Instead of protecting minors it artificially constructs a guilt of some discrimination against homosexuals who try to seduce and morally destroy these children. It is as if there could now be only laws on the protection of wolves against sheep and no other.

 

That the law on the protection of children, if it is not yet in force, may be “reviewed”, there has been a whole net of all kinds of organizations involved. We quote the EU resolution, pts. 6,7: “The European Parliament instructs its committee responsible to follow up the issue. It instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the candidate countries, the President and Parliament of Lithuania, the Agency for Fundamental Rights and the Council of Europe.”

 

Response: In terms of common sense it should be the parents who decide about their children and the organizations mentioned should naturally support the basic human rights of the child and family and not promote the opposite. In accordance with the EU laws there are different basic rights. Not for children and parents but for homosexuals who are discriminated because they cannot corrupt children – it is turned on its head! This is how the antichristian spirit changes the thinking, hiding behind neutral phrases which in practice it interprets in quite the opposite way to that which everyone was used to until that time.

 

In its resolution against Lithuania the European Parliament claims human rights, fundamental freedoms, rights of the child and especially the EU Treaty, the EC Treaty and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In every place it quotes the following phrase: “Unanimously to take appropriate action to combat discrimination based on sexual orientation.” Next it quotes the directives of the Council 2000/43 EC and 2000/78 EC which prohibit “direct or indirect discrimination based on sexual orientation...” with regard to the “Proposal for a Council Directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of ... sexual orientation” (presented by the Commission on 2nd July 2008 – Com. 2008/0426) and with regard to Art. 21, pt. 1 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights which prohibits any discrimination based on sexual orientation.

 

Objection: What does it mean ‘unanimously to take appropriate action to combat discrimination based on sexual orientation’?!

We ask: How are homosexuals discriminated? If they do not harm anyone, people do not discriminate them in any way. Normally, man and woman are naturally oriented toward the founding of a family, procreation of offspring and have a natural right and duty to morally educate their children (it means to protect them lest they should be seduced into criminality, drug abuse, alcoholism or sexual perversity). The parents cannot be indifferent when through school pressure is exerted which orients their children homosexually. This is a sin, dependence and work of an unclean spirit which enslaves its victim. Jesus cast out unclean spirits – that means, He “took unambiguous action to combat discrimination by demons who pervert sexual orientation”.

 

Quotation of the EU resolution: “A)...whereas the EU is a community of values based on human rights, fundamental freedoms, democracy and the rule of law, equality and non-discrimination, and whereas directives have been approved and proposed to reach this aim, including the fight against discrimination based on sexual orientation...”

Objection: These values and these rights, so-called freedoms, are phrases similar to those once used by the superpowers of Communism and Nazism. These so-called values in fact deny the moral principles anchored in Europe for almost 2000 years.

 

Quotation of the EU resolution: “B)...whereas sexual orientation is a matter falling within the remit of the individual right to privacy, guaranteed by international, European and national human rights law, and equality and non-discrimination should be promoted by public authorities...”

Quotation of the EU resolution: “C)...whereas on 14 July 2009 the Lithuanian Parliament approved amendments to the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effects of Public Information that will come into force on 1 March 2010...”

 

Objection: Amid the EU’s citations, norms and laws the adoption of the law on the protection of minors looks like discrimination.

 

Quotation of the EU resolution: “D)...whereas the wording of the law, with particular reference to Article 4 thereof, is vague and legally unclear and might lead to controversial interpretations...”

Objection: The law on the protection of minors is absolutely clear and concrete. We ask: Is it not rather the following that is vague and legally unclear and might lead to controversial interpretations?

 

The EU resolution, points A, B, repeats the terms sexual orientation and discrimination.

• The term “discrimination”

On the example of Lithuania it is evident that: 1) it is discrimination against Lithuania and its laws; 2) it is discrimination against defenceless children by gay-activists and other individuals with different sexual orientation. So who discriminates whom? The term “discrimination” in the EU laws is turned on its head and given a totally controversial interpretation. Here it becomes revealed what spirit is behind the LT – the spirit of lie and manipulation leading to both temporal and eternal death! The term “discrimination” in the LT is vague and legally unclear and leads to controversial interpretations.

 

• The term “sexual orientation”

We ask why the authors did not state precisely that this term refers to homosexuals in particular. Otherwise the term “sexual orientation” also includes paedophilia – sexual child abuse (but it concerns above all homosexuality), next zoophilia and other deviations such as sexual sadism, sexual killing etc. These people possessed with unclean spirits should be protected by the EU laws against their defenceless victims?

 

Owing to strong psychological pressure and agitation the Lisbon Treaty in fact had to be adopted – however, those who voted for it did not even know what it actually was about. Cannot it now lead to controversial interpretations?

Quotation of the EU resolution: “F)...whereas it is unclear what kind of materials would fall under this law and whether its jurisdiction extends to books, art, press, publicity, music and public representations such as theatre, exhibitions or demonstrations...”

Objection: Should there not have been similar concrete questions presented publicly before the signing of the Lisbon Treaty by individual states? It is a matter of course that neither books nor art nor press nor publicity nor music nor public representations such as theatre, exhibitions or demonstrations of gay parades can be a legal means for mass dissemination of moral decay of youth or for propagation of homosexuality. So what is the problem?

 

Quotation of the EU resolution: “G)...whereas the Swedish Presidency of the EU has discussed the law with the Lithuanian authorities, while the new Lithuanian President has declared that she will act to ensure that the law is in conformity with EU and international requirements...”

We ask: What concretely do these lofty phrases mean? They mean that the law will be amended in such manner that homosexuals will continue morally corrupting minors because it is in conformity with EU and so-called international requirements. What conformity can there be if the EU promotes and protects homosexual activists so that they can morally corrupt minors? They either can do so or can not. The EU calls protection of children discrimination and in its principles it de facto challenges to fight against it! How can this be brought to conformity?

 

Question: What is the true nature of the EU with all its so-called laws? President Klaus said: “In connection with the Lisbon Treaty the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights will be interpreted and promoted in a manner which is dangerous for us... The courts throughout Europe will interpret such terms as ‘discrimination’ in their own way. Then we will no longer be able to defend ourselves; making decisions will no longer be under our control.”

It is similar to the loftily-phrased Communist laws the interpretation of which, however, was quite the opposite. It is the same with every totalitarian system.

A model of manipulation, lack of democracy, discrimination, pressure and deprivation of freedom has been revealed on the example of Lithuania!

Quotation of the EU resolution: “1. (The European Parliament) asks the Agency for Fundamental Rights to give an opinion on the law and the amendments to it in the light of the EU Treaties and EU law.”

 

We ask: What, according to these phrases, will be left of the protection of minors against moral corruption caused by homosexuals, if this corruption is not only protected but relentlessly promoted by the EU? It is as if the wolf determined and modified the rights of the sheep. There is only one result: liquidation of the sheep.

Quotation of the EU resolution: “2. ... reaffirms the importance for the EU to fight against all forms of discrimination, and in particular discrimination based on sexual orientations.”

Objection: Once again it repeats the demand that the EU should fight in particular against discrimination based on sexual orientation. We ask again what exactly the terms “to fight”, “discrimination” and “sexual orientation” define. These terms are not exactly defined anywhere, so they are “vague and legally unclear and might lead to controversial interpretations”.

 

Quotation of the EU resolution: “4. ... welcomes the statements made by the new President of the Republic of Lithuania and the creation of a working group in Lithuania charged with evaluating possible changes to the law, and invites the Lithuanian President and authorities to ensure that national laws are compatible with human rights and fundamental freedoms as enshrined in international and European law.”

We ask: Do the above-mentioned high institutions protect the right of defenceless children or do they protect perverts who will morally corrupt these children? What accord can the victim have with the murderer? The result is the victim’s death.

 

There has been pressure brought to bear on the President and on the state authorities in order that they “ensure” conformity with EU laws and rights in which the essential point is propagation of homosexuality even among minors. So this is no accord but a dictate and deprivation of rights for the protection of minors, which is contrary to conscience and to natural ethical and moral principles.

 

All state laws in Europe were founded on the Decalogue, God’s laws and human conscience in the past. Now there have been different laws established, which are contrary to God’s law as well as to conscience. Who are they directed against? If Christians are going to keep God’s laws, they will be persecuted. The case of Lithuania has revealed covert malice: phrases speaking about human freedom, human laws and civil rights pursue the exact opposite.

 

This new totalitarian structure seeks to seize full power and to start an overt persecution of living Christianity. This spirit is in unity with dead and traitorous Christianity! Is this really already the time of the coming of antichrist and his rule? The norm of every EU law is legalization of sin and perversion. How has one managed to deceive the Christians of Europe into signing their own sentence of death? Because the same spirit of death and spirit of antichrist which holds the highest posts in the EU is in power at the highest posts in the Catholic Church as well! As from 15th September 2009, this traitorous supreme hierarchy condemned itself, fell under the punishment of God’s curse, anathema, and all Cardinals and Prefects of Congregations along with their Secretaries thus excommunicated themselves from the Catholic Church, as according to the canon law so according to God’s law. Not even the Pope can alter this fact. This apostatical Church system bears responsibility for moral devastation of Europe and Christianity!