Juvenile justice – modern Fascism

 

Nowadays we may become witnesses and the first victims of a new law and of a special state body which compels our children to become enemies of their own parents, teachers, doctors and all adults who love them. This new law is called juvenile justice. A terrible life is in store for us parents. It is depressing and agonizing for an adult to see his or her own child being transformed into a homosexual before their eyes and perishing, and not to be allowed to prevent it. Moreover, you are in constant fear that your child will make a slip of the tongue and you will have to pay a heavy fine, or else you will be deprived of parental rights or put in prison for violating children’s rights.

  

This has led to the foundation of an “all-Ukrainian parents’ movement”. In western Ukraine, the name of the organization for the protection of family and children is “Christian Heritage Preservation Committee under the Protection of the Mother of God”.

 

Many pedagogues, children’s psychologists and lawyers have joined together in a struggle against the efforts to introduce the juvenile justice system in Ukraine. In April this year, the Minister of Justice in Ukraine O. Lavrynovych revoked his order to form a working group whose task was to work out the juvenile justice system. None the less, this is not yet a victory. Lobbyists are seeking to push this law through by all kinds of dishonest means. And they are supported from abroad.

 

It is very important that people active in the fight against harmful influences upon the children’s mental health and morals should be sheltered by an organization. In this way it is much easier to overcome the obstacles, for when demanding a certain prohibition from the authorities they do not act on their own behalf but as representatives of a parents’ organization. It is even more advantageous when this organization has certain levels, e.g. a district, regional and parliamentary one. If, for instance, the parents’ organization meets with failure in a particular matter within the district, it may turn to the higher members of this organization and use their influence.

 

E.g. in Vladivostok, Russia, a so-called “Stop AIDS” campaign was carried on, which actually was a series of rock concerts accompanied by condom and hypodermic distribution and a sale of vodka. When the parents’ association learnt of this, they raised a protest. Thanks to representatives of this movement there started a brochure propagation, and the association appealed to the district council for a cessation of this campaign. The result was that in other towns, where this campaign was to be repeated, it either did not take place at all or if it did it was without vodka, condoms and hypodermics.

  

It is also necessary that this parents’ organization should have its own website where it would regularly provide topical information. This would create better opportunities for coordinated efforts and various activities, and motivate even other organizations dealing with youth problems.

 

Juvenile justice

  

Juvenile justice means adoption of a law establishing a system of legal and judicial protection of the rights of minors by means of special courts and affiliated organizations which will help these courts. These institutions will enable children to bring complaints against their parents, pedagogues and other adults.

 

This all is done under the slogan of development of the “International Convention on Children’s Rights” (the Soviet Union signed it in 1989 as one of the first countries – without having the slightest idea of what it was actually about). Juvenile justice is already gaining ground in Western countries and has disastrous consequences.

 

The parents and pedagogues in the West now practically live under juvenile justice as under the sword of Damocles. Not only upbringing but even school education is being ruined in this way at an incredible speed. This is because juvenile justice focuses on cultural education, which, however, does not concern social outcasts who ill-treat and abuse their children, drink with them or teach them how to use drugs. Such individuals are liable to penalties imposed by the criminal code. Juvenile justice actually focuses on cultural families which give their children a normal upbringing. And this normal upbringing will be made impossible in that behind the so-called children’s rights is hidden a new form of dictatorship of children over adults. Yet in reality it is not a dictatorship of children but of those who stand behind them – a dictatorship of destroyers of the family and above all of life.

 

The experience from the West is very painful and sad. We have learnt of it not so much from Western citizens but rather from ones from Russia who faced this problem while they were living in the West. Example: Natalia Zacharova, a Russian actress, married a Frenchman and went to live in France in the early 90-ties. After some time her husband divorced her and brought an action against her in the juvenile court. The court resolved to take a three-year-old daughter away from the mother on a charge of “smother love”. The lawsuit has dragged on already for ten years. Today the girl is thirteen, and when she was taken away from her mother she was three years old. The mother has applied all her strength in the struggle for her child. In vain. In actual fact, juvenile justice is subordinate to no nominal government, no President, no state administration, to nobody. All the aggrieved are convinced that this is a new form of thievery, of which nobody had the slightest idea. Natalia Zacharova has founded her own association of juvenile justice victims. Today there is a large number of associations of this kind in the West. A lot of women share their testimonies of numerous cases of French mothers who took their lives because their child, or even all children, had been taken away from them. For if the juvenile justice bodies discover a “problem” with one child, they take away all the others as well.

 

Generally speaking, juvenile justice is an unmitigated evil aimed at complete ruination of life. If they want this evil to be legalized by state, they argue that children must be protected from violence. And all people believe them. Every day people hear about violence against children and the merciful hearts fill with pain, for nobody wants children to suffer. That is also why the majority of people, ignorant of the juvenile justice background, are convinced that juvenile justice is an excellent thing. And this has helped it gain ground in so many states by now.

  

Juvenile justice sometimes does allow contact with parents yet sometimes it does not, depending on whether the juvenile court considers it harmful for the child or not. All resolutions are carried by the court and the odds of obtaining any concessions are practically zero. In the case of Natalia Zacharova, there were intervals when she was allowed no contact with her daughter on the ground of written reports stating that the mother had still not understood the thing, that no results had been achieved in her case etc. And even if they did allow them to meet, many times the meeting was very painful: the child was brought into a special room, accompanied by two protectresses – juvenile social workers. One of them watched the little girl and the other the mother. The meeting could take place only in their presence. Some questions may be asked by the mother but some must not. Natalia Zacharova says that she was forbidden to embrace her daughter because of her so-called “smother love” which could not be displayed. Such conditions of a visit resemble prison.

  

Psychologists play a very important role in juvenile justice, particularly those who base their position on psychoanalysis. Juvenile courts judge an excessive display of affection from this point of view. Many of these psychoanalysts are now questioning the conviction that the mother cannot be replaced by anyone. It is especially this theory of theirs which makes it so easy for juvenile justice to take children away from their mothers. The traditional view of the family has always maintained that it is very difficult to replace the parents. The loss of parents causes inexpressible sorrow. To become an orphan is a great tragedy. People in the past would never even think of such a thing, let alone say: “It makes no difference who the mother is.”

 

In the West, this psychoanalytic approach developed gradually, its method became widespread and changed the world view. And today, as we can see, maternal affection forms grounds for maternal deprivation sentence. In fact, the courts may thus find whatever reasons they like for taking the child away from the mother.

 

Modern terminology has replaced the term “natural mother” by a derogatory zoological term “birth mother”. In essence, the term signifies simply a “female” who has given birth to offspring, which can easily be taken away from her just as it is done with animals. A similar approach could be seen in the laboratories of the Third Reich. And so-called “learned men”, who form the apparatus of juvenile justice, have the main say: “To take the child away from the mother or not? Does she have the right to bring it up or not?” This is how children’s rights are being treated nowadays.

 

Manipulation of children’s rights

 

How does the treatment of children’s rights in juvenile justice differ from the traditional views?

The children’s wishes take priority over their duties (the duty of doing their lessons, obeying their parents...). If the child refuses to do something, no one can force it. For example, if it is not in the mood for tidying up its room, within the confines of juvenile justice this must be done by its parents. Within the bounds of juvenile justice punishment is virtually impossible. What does the Word of God say about punishing the children? “Whom the Lord loves He chastens... For what son is there whom a father does not chasten? ... If you are without chastening, then you are illegitimate and not sons.” (Hebr 12:6-8)

 

At the present time the laws prohibiting physical punishment are being accepted with enthusiasm in the West. The term of physical punishment includes even a slap in the face which nowadays is regarded as absolutely inadmissible. The term of psychical violence includes even a rebuke.

 

In Great Britain, for example, this all has already been established. According to law, parents no longer have the right to rebuke their children over the age of 14 because they already live their own lives, make their own decisions etc. And if for example a daughter who is over 16 slept out and came home early in the morning, according to law the parents do not even have the right to ask her where she had stayed the night. According to juvenile justice, she has a right to private life. Every sober-minded person will object: Hand in hand with the right goes the duty. If as a child she has the right to parental care (food, clothing, financial support), she has the duty of gratitude and obedience in return. When she reaches the age of 18 and stands on her own two feet, self-sufficient and independent of parents, then she has the full right to but also full responsibility for her own life.

 

Nowadays children spend too much time on the internet. There is a wide range of morally harmful web sites, by means of which children can come into contact with others; e.g. there are certain group movements whose members drink blood (Goths). A 15-year-old girl from Kiev said that when she falls into depression she cuts her arm and drinks her own blood. However, there also exist groups whose members drink the blood of other people. Children communicate via the internet in special chat forums. Within the confines of juvenile justice, parents do not have the right to intrude into these chats and ask their children what they are talking about or what they are doing, for this is the child’s private life.

 

Not long ago a movement called Emo has emerged in Russia. It is a group of girls over 11 which practically propagates lesbianism and suicides. The girl from Kiev explained to us that the Goths propagate dying – so-called beautiful dying. Gothic style is romantic and so death also must be beautiful. The members of Emo view life as terribly loathsome. And from the age of 11, when these children start to have sexual intercourse with each other, they convince themselves that life is absolutely unbearable and that it is best to die as soon as possible. This accounts for the frequent occurrence of suicides among them, which is done in special circumstances. However, with the introduction of juvenile justice the so-called protectors of individuals’ rights, who will build up the whole apparatus on the basis of either local or international laws, will argue that nobody has the right to interfere into the affairs of these minors.

 

Similarly, planned parenthood which is notorious even in the religious environment for its enforcement of abortions, contraception, sterilization and sexual education in schools results in devastation of the land, depopulation. Juvenile justice, however, likewise is an obvious means of depopulation. Or can children who are in no way restricted in their pursuit of evil live long? Some of them will die and some will become invalids.

 

The states which have already adopted the juvenile justice system have recorded a decrease in the birth rate since nobody wants their children to turn informers who will bring their own parents to justice. Juvenile justice has also caused a sharp increase in the juvenile delinquency rate.

 

When the Convention on Children’s Rights was signed in the Soviet Union in 1989, the Soviet Union as well as any other country did not have the faintest idea of something like gay pride, legalization of same-sex unions, adoption of children by homosexuals etc. When they were signing the right of a child to private life, they had in mind completely different things, as e.g. the right to education. After signing the document, the government representatives did not anticipate that there would be a right to so-called sexual education established in future and that the parents who would not permit their children to attend this subject might be deprived of parental rights. But one should then apply the same principle as in a bank. When the clients sign whatever contract, one of the conditions is that in case the circumstances change both parties can also change the contract. So considering the above-mentioned case, it was a deceit. One thing was signed and another done.

 

In September 2006, the Charter of Social and Economic Rights was signed which contains an article on compulsory health education of the public, including children. An integral part of it is sexual education. The existence of these laws signed and ratified by the Parliament of Ukraine provides the basis for the juvenile justice system and for compulsory sexual education in schools. The ideological staff regulating all these processes has its centre at the Ministry of Family, Youth and Sports. There is a special section there dealing with the questions of the protection of children’s rights. It is an ideological centre. There are two similar centres at the Ministry of Justice, but these do not have so far-reaching an influence as this one. The trustee of this process is the international organization UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund). In this sense we can see that purely organizational structures already exist. In addition, there is now a law on family violence prevention which allows the justice system to intrude on the private family life in case of violence. Violence includes psychological violence, pressure etc. One can thus easily become a lawbreaker as it is quite difficult to get a grasp of what the term of violence actually means today.

 

In an effort to establish the juvenile justice system, UNICEF creates a myth that the main problem of the Ukrainian children is their parents. This is a lie. The main problem is an ill society which has fallen away from the living God and His laws!

 

What is in store for Ukraine unless we repent of our indifference?

Supposing young people go through compulsory sexual education, they will take a fancy to perversion. Then, naturally, they will call for changes in God’s Law and in the Holy Scripture, for the Anglican Church also has already legalized same-sex marriages.

Besides, in conformity with juvenile justice standards juvenile training schools will be dissolved.

Children and youth under 18 who committed murders, rapes or robberies with violence will in no case be allowed to be deprived of liberty.

Adults will use children for committing the most abominable crimes and any crimes whatever, but according to the norms of juvenile justice these children cannot be punished.

The introduction of the juvenile justice system in USA resulted in a juvenile delinquency explosion. The government took alarm and tightened the legislation. Some US states even have death penalty for children over the age of 6. Nevertheless, it happened in a certain school for children over 5 that a 5-year-old pupil brought a gun to school and shot his teacher and classmates to death.

It is necessary to reject whatever detrimental “innovations” – in the sphere of law, family, ethics as well as in any other sphere. One can object: “So offer an alternative.” The right alternative is prohibition! Prohibition of evil by law – this is the alternative we need today.

 

What is the task of parents, teachers, politicians and lawyers?

It is necessary to join forces and establish organizations for the protection of children and family by means of which they will be able to protect children and parents against the mendacious and forced demagogy of so-called juvenile justice.

 

Lvov, 15 June 2010

 

Elaborated from other sources by the Christian Heritage Preservation Committee under the Protection of the Mother of God