Two inspectors – two differently oriented women – control Ukraine

 

 

                                                                                                              To Members of the Ukrainian Parliament

 

Quotation (from an article published on http://www.civicua.org/news/view.html?q=1407281): “‘The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe hopes that the Ukrainian government will observe human rights and freedoms,’ the co-reporter of the Monitoring Committee of the Council of Europe, Ms Mailis Reps, announced.”

Commentary: This is psychological manipulation with the aim of making an impression that Ukraine does not observe human rights and freedoms. Ukraine does observe them. However, Ms Reps does not have in mind observance of human rights at all but promotion of homosexual laws and dictatorship which will subsequently violate the rights of the Ukrainian citizens. The Ukrainian government, which truly protects human rights, should stand up against this contemporary homosexual dictatorship.

 

Quotation: “She expressed her concern over a recent increase in the number of complaints lodged by civic organizations, concerning growing violations of human rights and freedoms in Ukraine.”

Commentary: These complaints have been fabricated on someone’s order. And as for the civic organizations, these are in fact homosexuals and lesbians who according to this fabricated scenario demand privilege laws to the detriment of the majority (as it can already be seen in the EU).

If somebody is a homosexual but does not molest or violate youth or other citizens, nobody either discriminates or punishes him. But in case he breaks the laws, he is punished in the same way as anyone else. However, this is no violation of human rights and freedoms, as it is purposefully dramatized by Ms Reps.

 

Quotation: “In particular, Ms Reps expressed her concern over complaints about violation of the freedom of speech, the right of assembly, the right of a free press as well as over complaints about violation of human rights and freedoms on the part of police officers.”

Commentary: We ask who of the Ukrainian citizens writes these complaints. The answer is clear: nobody except for homosexuals. What is meant by the term “the right of assembly”? The answer: It actually means gay-prides which are prohibited by reason of protection of the citizens against homodictatorship. If we look at general experience we can observe the following scenario: first there come gay-prides and these are immediately followed by the enforcement of new laws to the detriment of the majority of citizens, accompanied with harsh punishments for so-called homophobia and with the propagation of homosexuality in the mass media, education... by these perverted people. The whole complex of homodictatorship starts from a gay-pride. As the saying goes: give the devil an inch and he’ll take an ell! What does Ms Reps mean by the term “freedom of speech”? The answer: What she means is that homosexuals can lie, deceive, publish demagogical articles and mislead the defenceless people. Noone else has then any right to defend the truth and the real rights of the majority against them any more.

 

We ask what “freedom of speech” the mass media enjoy in the EU. The answer: If somebody tries to protect their child against the homosexual propaganda and perversion, they will obtain no freedom – to put it bluntly. Gays introduce dictatorship where there is no more freedom of speech, freedom of conscience or freedom of Christian expression.

 

Ms Reps hypocritically accuses the police of violating human rights and freedoms. The police too are thus being intimidated. Why? In order that they should be afraid to punish homosexuals when these disturb the public peace and violate the Ukrainian laws, for they – homosexuals – are a privileged supranational caste.

 

Quotation: “‘In the eyes of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Ukraine has achieved considerable success in protection of the rights and freedoms of the citizens’, said Ms Reps.”

 

“...has achieved considerable success...” Commentary: Evidently “considerable” success in the eyes of Ms Reps is that at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg on 27th– 30th April 2010, the Ukrainian delegates did not stand up radically against the propagation of homosexuality as it was done by Russia, Poland, Moldova, Italy and Armenia. The Ukrainian politicians were silent, and Ms Reps now treats it as success.

 

“...in protection of the rights and freedoms of the citizens...” Commentary: If the gay-activists arouse homosexual inclinations in the young generation in schools by means of their perverted propaganda, they will thus bring the whole nation into modern slavery. The colonizers had a similar strategy – they offered the aborigines “fire water” and made their tribal chiefs slaves of alcohol. Then they could manipulate them the way it suited them. Homosexuality causes mental disorders, makes man cynical and egoistic, is connected with the spread of venereal diseases, predominantly of AIDS, as well as with drugs, causes deep depressions and leads to suicides. That is why the Ukrainian laws concerning “protection of the rights and freedoms of the citizens” also include protection against homosexual indoctrination and contamination of youth. Unfortunately, Ms Reps’ comprehension of rights and freedoms runs counter to whatever logic: she acts in favour of a perverted minority towards enslavement of the majority of the nation. She does not understand that natural and just laws do not give criminals the freedom to commit crimes but protect the defenceless against these criminals. Her interpretation of “human rights and freedoms” is a deceit, manipulation and distortion of their true essence.

 

Quotation: “If these complaints are true, we would like to emphasize that the Council of Europe will never acquiesce to so serious violations of human rights and freedoms.”

Commentary: Ms Reps now hypocritically appeals to the fabricated complaints lodged by a scattering of homosexuals, so as to accuse all Ukraine of violation of rights and freedoms. We would like to point out that in the interpretation of Ms Reps human rights and freedoms are turned upside down.

 

She manipulates a few complaints, though she herself admits that she does not even know whether they are true at all, and thus she intimidates the whole Ukrainian government by putting it in the felon’s dock. Ms Reps wags her finger, demanding that the government should change its natural and moral attitudes as well as logical reasoning and open Ukraine to the dictatorship of homosexuals.

 

Quotation: “In case similar complaints of civic organizations are proved to be truthful, all who are guilty of allowing human rights violations in Ukraine will be punished.”

Commentary: We are astonished at the impudence of Ms Reps who without concrete proofs of violation of the Ukrainian laws threatens an independent state and its government by saying that all the responsible will be punished. Once homodictatorship has been established in the EU, there are no true rights of the protection of children, family and Christianity any more. Those who have introduced such laws which punish defenceless victims and protect homosexual criminals should be punished in the first place. How can one demand that a non-member foreign state should be punished according to criminal homosexual laws which run counter to human nature and morals and which, moreover, were not even adopted by Ukraine? Ukraine is not – and we hope it will never be – under the EU dictatorship with these perverted laws. Ms Reps seeks first to fabricate some discrimination against homosexuals and then to exert EU’s international pressure on Ukraine so as to make it accept unnatural laws which, however, would be morally harmful for the defenceless Ukrainian citizens. This homosexual abomination would afterwards be mercilessly enforced upon all people through so-called homophobic laws, and subsequently disintegrate the whole nation and bring down a curse on it.

 

Quotation: “For her part, the second co-reporter of the Monitoring Committee of the Council of Europe, Renate Wolwend, added that they had discussed the issue with the Prime Minister of Ukraine Mykola Azarov.”

Commentary: Her alleged discussion with the Prime Minister is to make an impression that he concurs with this pseudo-politics of hers. This is manipulation and demagogy. It is well known that the Prime Minister is a guarantor of sound moral values in Ukraine and has never acted as a defender, let alone propagator, of homosexual perversion.

 

Quotation: “Ms Wolwend underlined that the next mission of PACE co-reporters intends to visit Ukraine in September this year. In the span of the upcoming visit they will focus special attention on observance of human rights and freedom of speech.”

Commentary: An ideological and demagogical procedure in accordance with a well-tried scenario: First, in March and April this year the Ukrainian delegation was massaged in Strasbourg and with a clear purpose personal and close contacts were established with some members of the delegation. On 5th June 2010 a conference was held in Yalta, focused on homosexual and gender propagation. On 11th June there was a meeting in Kiev, during which the EU committed Ukraine to “cooperation” by donation of 14 million EUR. At the same time the inspectors came with an aim to intimidate and create an impression that Ukraine is as if a criminal who now has to have fear. From this position Ms Wolwend fixes a concrete time so that even the Ukrainian mass media get mobilized by means of fear and finances and start to change the mind of uninformed citizens in the sphere of gender and homosexuality. If the government does not permit this harmful propagation, they will launch a campaign under the slogan “Ukraine violates human rights and does not observe freedom of speech”. Then they will draw a demagogic conclusion that now there is no other choice but to give the “discriminated” homosexuals in Ukraine their own laws, and these forced laws will entitle them to discriminate all Ukraine. This is manipulation and hypocrisy again. And we ask: Isn’t part of this scenario of breaking the Ukrainian morality also the recent invitation of President Yanukovych by the American President Obama who is a propagator of gender revolution and homosexuality? Ms Reps, Ms Wolwend and those who are behind them are well aware of the fact that the greatest obstacle to the penetration of the homosexual epidemic is the current President V. Yanukovych. This is a real spiritual and psychological fight which only few people can perceive. Prayer and repentance play the most important part in this fight.

 

As for the so-called inspection in September, we recommend that these two women with different sexual orientation should first check up on all states of the European Union and see to the observance of rights there, yet not the rights of homosexuals but of those who are discriminated by them. And we also recommend that with their arrival at Ukraine they should render an account of how these laws are observed in the EU. This will be the first question to which they will have to give the response. However, it would be better if Ms Reps and Ms Wolwend did not visit Ukraine any more.

 

So we recommend that Ms Wolwend and Ms Reps, as co-reporters of the Monitoring Committee of the Council of Europe, should check up on the observance of human rights in the EU and in September render an account of their inspection.

 

The freedom of speech in the EU looks like this:

 

1)      In England, it is prohibited to sell Christian postcards with the Child Jesus lying in a manger even at Christmas. However, all kinds of pornography must be not only tolerated but directly propagated even on the Christian territories in the EU.

 

2)      In some EU states, the clergy and religious are prohibited from wearing clerical dress and monk’s habit in public. Gays, on the other hand, are allowed to march publicly in the streets in eccentric dress or even without dress and to practise sodomy publicly, even in front of children. What freedom is it and what rights?

 

3)      At the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, Italy has to remove all crosses and religious symbols from schools and hospitals, regardless of the fact that it is tied up with the Italian culture and with the almost 2000-year Christian tradition. On the other hand, almost all billboards display pornography and nobody can demand whatever restrictions. What freedom and rights for whom?

 

4)      A nurse in England was thrown out of work because she wore a small cross around her neck. Although she appealed to various courts, she lost the case. By contrast, satanists wear a inverted cross with impunity even in public to ridicule Christianity. What freedom and rights for whom?

 

5)      A pastor in Sweden who said in his sermon that homosexuality is a sin was put in prison. Where is the freedom of speech? Where is religious freedom?

 

6)      A certain pastor in Scotland preached the Gospel in the streets. Suddenly there came a woman and asked him whether homosexuality was a sin. He replied: “Yes.” The woman immediately called the police and the pastor was arrested and taken to prison. Where is the freedom of speech and religious freedom here? Religious freedom is perhaps granted to Muslims and Hindus or Buddhists but not to Christians. What prevails in the EU is christianophobia.

 

7)      In Lithuania, the citizens protested against a gay-pride but because homosexuals sued out “permission”, the police no longer respected the rights of the majority and stood in defence of a scattering of gays who introduce perverted antivalues. Homosexuals had a right to organize a gay-pride; however, the majority of the Lithuanian citizens did not have a right to organize a protest action. What freedom is here and what rights?

 

8)      There was a bill proposed in Lithuania for an act relating to the protection of children against homosexual propaganda. The majority of the nation endorsed this bill. However, the EU declared that such laws discriminate the homosexual minority and prohibited Lithuania from passing the bill. What freedom is this and what rights? Homosexuals are allowed to spread corrupt influence but children and parents do not have the right to defend themselves.

 

9)      All EU citizens have found themselves in great powerlessness and injustice, when without them the EU passed laws which are against them. Even if they now organized day-and-night manifestations demanding the basic human rights, it would be of no avail. Moreover, they would be accused of so-called homophobia and punished. What freedom and rights for whom?

 

10)  A certain lesbian in France appealed to the Court in Strasbourg after the court in France denied her adoption of a child. The Strasbourg Court forced France to pay compensation to her and to give her the child. On the other hand, several families from Germany had to flee their country along with their children, otherwise their own children (not adopted ones) would be taken away from them. And that was only because the parents defended their children against homosexual propaganda. What freedom and what rights?

 

11)  A teacher in England who suggested to the mother of one of her pupils that she would pray for her ill child was dismissed from her job. The reason for her dismissal was violation of the child’s freedom. However, when gay activists or homosexual teachers force homosexual orientation upon the children and students, their parents are punished for defending them, for they thus commit so-called homophobia. What in fact is a crime here? Parents are punished for protecting their children and gay activists are protected by law for demoralization of children. What freedom and rights for whom?

 

We hope that the two differently sexually oriented commissioners of the monitoring committee, Ms Wolwend and Ms Reps, will check even other criminal cases in the EU besides these. Owing to a great number of them they will hardly have any time left to appear in Ukraine not only in September but at any time in the future. And not only them but all other differently oriented inspectors.

 

The Western world is facing total moral havoc, immorality, criminality and there is no monitoring committee which would restrain it. However, the Ukrainian government is now being hypocritically threatened only because at somebody’s instigation a handful of homosexuals have lodged some fabricated complaints, though their truthfulness is questioned even by the “inspectors” themselves. On the basis of these “complaints” they now threaten and intimidate the government of an independent state and by means of bribes (14 million EUR) seek to achieve one aim – to move homosexual laws through the legislature. These laws are to help them subordinate the whole Ukrainian nation to homosexual dictatorship and cause its total moral devastation.

 

Bishops’ Synod of the UOGCC

                         + Samuel OSBMr

                         + Markian OSBMr

                         + Metod?j OSBMr

                         + Eliáš OSBMr

 

Lvov (Ukraine), 17th June 2010

 

Copies to:

-         President of Ukraine V. Yanukovych

-         Prime Minister of Ukraine M. Azarov

-         President of Russia D. Medvedev

-         Deputies of Russia

-         EU Presidents and Deputies

 

 

Address: Synod of the UOGCC, 3 Sosnova St., Lvov - Bryukhovychi, 79491, Ukraine

www.uogcc.org.ua, www.community.org.ua; pidhirci.community@gmail.com