The second appeal to the European Parliament

                                                  (22 October 2010)

Dear eurodeputies,

in our appeal of 21st October 2010 we expressed our worry about the fact that on the EU’s initiative there have been structures established for big bribes with the purpose of annexing Ukraine to the EU and introducing amoral laws. This concerns homosexuality, transsexuality, paedophilia as well as establishment of a dictatorship which enforces crimes against humanity worse than those condemned at Nuremberg. It is a process of genocide of the Ukrainian nation. We pointed out that we are particularly worried by the unsolved cases of suicides of three mothers in the Poltava region after their children had been unlawfully taken away from them. It is the EU again who is responsible for this crime since it implemented draconian juvenile justice in the Poltava region in spite of the fact that it has not been approved in the legislation of Ukraine. In addition, we acquainted You with statistics of homosexuality showing that homosexuals account for more than 50% cases of AIDS, 70-80% of hepatitis B, 30.000 cases of paedophilic abuse in Los Angeles etc.

We raised a demand for abrogation of the Lisbon Treaty which is inhumane in its essence and, moreover, was imposed by deceit (by Merkel’s trick).

We demanded removal of the word “euthanasia” from the declaration of the PACE N. 1763 dated 7th October 2010. We sent a copy of the letter to Pope Benedict XVI, Orthodox Bishops and Presidents of Ukraine, Russia, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia and Armenia, Presidents of the EU member states, MPs of Ukraine and of the State Duma of Russia, mass media of Ukraine, Russia and Europe.

On 21st October 2010 the European Parliament planned to deal with six versions of resolutions concerning the situation in Ukraine. However, it was announced that the European Parliament adjourned the adoption of these resolutions to a later date.

The UOGCC appeals to the EU administration in Brussels as well as to its department in Kiev to publish these resolutions in the Ukrainian mass media and to enable a public discussion about the six versions. One party in the discussion will be the EU representatives and the other one, as the opposition, will be the representatives of the UOGCC. This is a true manifestation of democracy! From its own experience the UOGCC may testify that the mass media in Ukraine are under the monopolistic influence of the EU ideology and allow no freedom of speech, which is against democracy. Ukraine is critically endangered by introduction of the totalitarian system of the EU.

We quote the Head of the EU Department at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs: “We received a letter yesterday from President of the European Parliament, Jerzy Buzek, informing that two observers from the European Parliament will be present during the election in Ukraine.”

We are astonished at the EU’s statement in the form of an ultimatum, as if Ukraine was one of its colonies. In contrast to that, we propose that the Ukrainian government should choose two observers who would guarantee objectivity of the election. For the time being, the ex-Mayor of Moscow Y. Luzhkov and his adherents deserve the highest moral credit. Luzhkov bravely defended moral values against the antivalues of the West.

We propose that within the framework of democracy, President and Prime Minister of Ukraine should invite ex-mayor of Moscow with his cooperator and two assistants to supervise elections in Ukraine on 31st October 2010 along. At the same time we announce to the European Parliament the real will of the nation: Ukrainians do not want four aliens from the European Union to manipulate elections by means of the structures which they have built in Ukraine through bribes and betrayal. “Populists” from among the eurodeputies propose that the Ukrainian government should be appealed not to appoint such people to the public offices who could have “conflicts of interests”, and to call for constitutional and judicial reforms. Hereby the whole totalitarian structure of the EU unmasked itself as well as its usurping intentions in relation to Ukraine. Therefore it is inadmissible that some supervisors from the EU are present at the elections. We ask it means that such people cannot be elected who could have “conflicts of interest”. In other words it means: only such people can be elected who will promote exclusively the antihuman and totalitarian ideology of the EU.

Changing the Ukrainian Constitution or judiciary in this situation would signify meeting totalitarian conditions of the EU and annexation of Ukraine to the EU. Within the framework of the freedom of speech we propose public discussion of this issue, similarly as we proposed a discussion of the six resolutions of the EU.

Conclusion:

In no case can the euro-supervisors be present at the elections as their aim is annexation of Ukraine to the EU.

Bishops’ Synod of the UOGCC

+ Eliáš OSBMr, + Metod?j OSBMr, + Markian OSBMr, + Samuel OSBMr

Lvov, 22nd October 2010

Copies to: President and Prime Minister of Ukraine; Ex-mayor of Moscow J. Luzhkov; Presidents of the countries of Europe; Mass media; MPs of Ukrainian Parliament and of Russian Duma

Address: Synod of the UOGCC, 3 Sosnova St., Lvov - Bryukhovychi, 79491, Ukraine 

www.uogcc.org.ua, www.community.org.ua; pidhirci.community@gmail.com